University administrations have created Bias Response Teams (BRTs) as a means to navigate student-to-student campus disputes. BRTs both collect data on reported student conflicts as well as offer students conflict resolution, educational, and other university resources to manage their disputes. Yet these BRTs have been under siege in the courts, often challenged on the grounds that such systems chill students’ speech. This Essay examines the structure and purpose of BRTs as well as many of the legal challenges they have faced in the past decade. It then intertwines this analysis with scholarship on dispute system design to explore how such university systems may be reconfigured in response to these legal challenges. Any solution should both maintain student resources and address concerns over First Amendment violations. As such, rather than fully stripping BRTs of their power, campuses should consider severing connections between their formal, punitive campus resources and BRTs while maintaining access to informal resolution options such as mediation and restorative justice practices.