Most Recent Print Issue

Volume 77, Issue 2


Article

The Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty

by  William M.M. Kamin

American habeas corpus, long conventionally known as the Great Writ of Liberty, is more properly understood as the Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty—a tool for We the People to insist that when our agents in government exercise our delegated penal powers, they remain faithful to our sovereign will. Once we grasp this conceptual shift, the…

Article

FTX’d: Conflicting Public and Private Interests in Chapter 11

by  Jonathan C. Lipson & David Skeel

Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is often justified by vague assertions that reorganizing troubled companies is in the “public interest.” There has, however, been surprisingly little effort to consider seriously what this public interest is, how it should be operationalized, or who should pay for it. Based on a case study of the controversial…

Article

Equal Protection, Title IX, and the School Civil Rights Collapse

by  Emily Suski

Tens of thousands of students in K-12 schools suffer sexual harassment each year. While presidential administrations and Congress have proposed reforms to Title IX to tackle this problem, the potential of Section 1983 Equal Protection Clause claims to protect students from and remedy their sexual harassment has gone overlooked. Not only does the Equal Protection…

Note

Against the Article II Theory of Standing

by  Elliot M. Setzer

While standing doctrine has traditionally been rooted in Article III’s Case or Controversy requirement, there is growing support for the view that limits on plaintiffs’ standing stem instead from the President’s Article II duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Proponents of this theory argue that private enforcement actions unconstitutionally interfere with…

View Current & Past Print Volumes

Recent Online Essays

The Coming Assault on Categorical Gun Prohibitions

Introduction Lower courts are grappling with challenges to what were, until recently, settled Second Amendment laws—most notably, the federal laws prohibiting felons and those involuntarily committed from purchasing or possessing firearms. These categorical prohibitions are two of the most prominent so-called “federal prohibitors.” People who fall into one or more of the prohibited categories may…

Read Article

California, an Island?

Lincoln L. Davies and Stephanie Lenhart warn that the energy future of the Western United States will be determined by the choices California makes over the next two years. Davies and Lenhart urge California to move towards a regional western electricity market to improve energy efficiency, reliability, and sustainability, and to avoid isolating California’s electricity market.

Read Article

The Pardon Power and Federal Sentence-Reduction Motions: A Response to Yost and Flowers

In his response to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and former Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers, Jaden Lessnick argues that the federal sentence-reduction statute (18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)) is not preempted by the presidential pardon power. Lessnick contends that the statute does not offend the traditional separation-of-powers principle, and preemption is not justified under the unitary executive theory.

Read Article

Alternative Action After SFFA

Prof. Kim Forde-Mazrui of the University of Virginia responds to Sonja Starr’s print Article, The Magnet School Wars and the Future of Colorblindness. Forde-Mazrui argues that even if courts adopt the “ends-colorblindness” framework described by Starr, “alternative action” policies meant to promote diversity may still be constitutionally permissible.

Read Article

The Making of the A2J Crisis

Access to justice has become a defining legal and political issue. In this Essay, Nora Freeman Engstrom and David Freeman Engstrom work to identify the cause of the Access to Justice Crisis.

Read Article