Essay In Defense of Corruption CNN Debates, the Press Clause, and Campaign Finance Regulation by Michael Francus on March 28, 2016 Introduction This election cycle, CNN’s Republican presidential debates have twice violated campaign finance law, specifically by failing to issue invitations based on “pre-established objective criteria.” These violations went unpunished, not because of the ineptitude of the regulators, but because of the absurdity of the regulation violated, which presumes that television debates violate campaign finance law,… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Because and Effect Another Take on Inclusive Communities by Lee Anne Fennell on January 30, 2016 Introduction What does “because of race” mean in an antidiscrimination statute like the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (FHA)? The question arose last Term in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., the case in which the Supreme Court recognized a disparate impact cause of action in the FHA. In… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Who Should Define Injuries for Article III Standing? by Daniel Townsend on December 16, 2015 Introduction In November, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, one of the Term’s most talked-about cases. The case presents a relatively unsympathetic plaintiff, Thomas Robins, and the prospect of sizeable class action damages. That combination may explain why one particular narrative has become popular in both mainstream media and legal-industry press… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay The Many Meanings of “Because Of” A Comment on Inclusive Communities Project by Noah D. Zatz on November 12, 2015 Introduction The Supreme Court recently surprised many observers by upholding disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) in a case called Inclusive Communities Project. Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion ratcheted down the hostility to disparate impact analysis recently on display in his Ricci v. DeStefano opinion and in other earlier opinions he had joined.… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Government Speech and Political Courage by Helen Norton on October 30, 2015 Among the most prominent examples of government speech is a state’s choice to fly—or not to fly—the Confederate flag above or adjacent to its capitol. The recent vigorous public debates in South Carolina and elsewhere across the country reveal the potential power of governments’ expressive choices, including their power to inform, celebrate, cajole, wound, and… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay The Court and Overcriminalization by Michael Pierce on October 10, 2015 Introduction In both Bond v. United States and Yates v. United States, the Supreme Court reversed federal criminal convictions. Neither defendant’s conduct was constitutionally protected; there were no procedural irregularities in either trial, no vagueness or overbreadth issues, and no police misconduct. Instead, each case involved prosecuting a small-time individual with a big-time statute: In… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Retroactivity, the Due Process Clause, and the Federal Question in Montgomery v. Louisiana by Jason M. Zarrow & William H. Milliken on September 28, 2015 Introduction The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana to determine whether the Court’s holding in Miller v. Alabama, that “the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders,” applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. That question is important in its own… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Response Isolating Litigants A Response to Pamela Bookman by Alan M. Trammell on August 31, 2015 This Essay is a response to Pamela K. Bookman’s Litigation Isolationism. Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay The Original Meaning of Constitutional Inventors Resolving the Unanswered Question of the MadStad Litigation by Alexander J. Kasner on June 29, 2015 Introduction In litigation that garnered national attention, a “garage inventor” of a new design for motorcycle windshields challenged the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution’s Patent Clause. The basis of the challenge in the case—MadStad Engineering, Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office—uncoils as a pleasing syllogism: the AIA transitioned… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Substantive Due Process as a Two-Way Street How the Court Can Reconcile Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty by Mark L. Rienzi on May 23, 2015 Introduction Last month, the potential conflict between same-sex marriage and religious liberty prompted death threats, arson threats, and the temporary closure of a small-town pizzeria in Indiana. The restaurant’s owner had admitted to a reporter that she could not cater a hypothetical same-sex wedding because of her religious beliefs (even though she otherwise serves gay… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Response Widening the Aperture on Fourth Amendment Interests A Comment on Orin Kerr’s The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet by David G. Delaney on May 18, 2015 Introduction In The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet, Orin Kerr highlights several important Fourth Amendment questions that few courts have addressed. But in “offer[ing] a general framework for applying the Fourth Amendment to a global computer network in a way that maintains the existing territorial conception of the Fourth Amendment,” Kerr’s article focuses too narrowly… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Safe and Effective for Human Executions? Glossip v. Gross and the Eighth Amendment Bar Against Off-Label Drug Lethal Injection by Rose Carmen Goldberg on May 4, 2015 Introduction In June the U.S. Supreme Court will decide Glossip v. Gross, a challenge to Oklahoma’s lethal-injection protocol brought by three death row inmates. The inmates argue that the protocol’s first drug, midazolam, violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment because it does not reliably induce unconsciousness. Midazolam’s inadequacy, they claim, could… Volume 68 (2015-2016)
Essay Share and Share Alike? Considering Racial Discrimination in the Nascent Room-Sharing Economy by Michael Todisco on March 14, 2015 Introduction The motel’s neon vacancy sign lures the weary traveler from the freeway. She enters and inquires after a room. The receptionist, without looking up from his crossword, slides a clipboard across the front desk. An application? When did motels become prep schools? The traveler scribbles in the requested information. Name: Monique Jackson. Reason you… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay Section 2 Zero-Sums How the Supreme Court Misconstrued the Voting Rights Act, Limits Minority Representation, and Dangerously Pits Minorities Against Each Other by Salvador E. Pérez on February 28, 2015 Introduction Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible; but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary. —Reinhold Niebuhr Fifty years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), legal controversies surrounding voter identification, early voting, voter registration, campaign finance, and redistricting continue to raise fundamental questions that, when answered, inform a theory of democracy.… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay Dual Registration Voting Systems Safer and Fairer? by Chelsea A. Priest on January 25, 2015 Introduction On November 4, 2014, more than 21,000 Kansans who had attempted to register to vote were denied that opportunity. The cause? A law that went into effect in January 2013 requiring that registrants provide proof of citizenship. Kansas’s law is only one of the most recent examples of this country’s general trend toward stricter… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay New Republican Bill Is Network Neutrality in Name Only by Barbara van Schewick & Morgan N. Weiland on January 20, 2015 Introduction After a year of debates and a month before the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC’s) rulemaking on network neutrality, the GOP has finally joined the party. Through a draft bill released late last week, congressional Republicans have taken a step in the direction of supporting network neutrality. That’s a good thing, and moves them closer… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay The Case for an International Court of Civil Justice by Maya Steinitz on December 2, 2014 Introduction We live in a world in which the victims of cross-border mass torts de facto (not de jure) have no court to turn to in order to pursue legal action against American multinational corporations when they are responsible for disasters. The only way to provide a fair and legitimate process for both victims and corporations… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay Dumping Debt and Seizing Assets Ukrainian Countermeasures for Russian Aggression by Cynthia Barmore & Chris Miller on December 1, 2014 Introduction Russia’s war on Ukraine is an unlawful use of force that has imposed needless suffering on Ukraine and its people. Through (1) its unjustified occupation and annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and (2) its support for antigovernment insurgencies in Ukraine’s eastern provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk, Russia is largely responsible for an unprovoked war… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay Questioning Sincerity The Role of the Courts After Hobby Lobby by Ben Adams & Cynthia Barmore on November 7, 2014 Introduction In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to Hobby Lobby, Mardel, and Conestoga Wood Specialties, three closely held corporations, and held that the contraception mandate of the Affordable Care Act substantially burdened their religious exercise. The sincerity of their religious beliefs was… Volume 67 (2014-2015)
Essay The Brady Colloquy by Jason Kreag on September 2, 2014 Introduction Ensuring that prosecutors comply with their ethical and due process disclosure requirements has been a distinctly vexing problem for the criminal justice system, particularly in light of the frequency of wrongful convictions caused by prosecutorial misconduct. The problem stems from the shortcomings of the Brady doctrine and institutional forces that make it difficult to… Volume 67 (2014-2015)