Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Before the Robe Judge Neil M. Gorsuch by Mark C. Hansen on March 12, 2017 The Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch was not the distinguished silver-haired jurist we see now when he walked through the doors of our start-up law firm in the fall of 1995. He was, like the other supremely talented young lawyers we hired to help us build a practice in the attorney-infested (or should I say shark-infested?)… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch A Personal Reflection on Judge Neil M. Gorsuch from a Former Colleague by Michael W. McConnell on March 12, 2017 I served with Judge Neil Gorsuch on the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for over three years, before I left the bench to teach constitutional law at Stanford. I sat with him in about fifty cases. Sometimes we disagreed, strongly. More often, we agreed. I want to share my impressions of Judge Gorsuch… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Mainstream Jurisprudence and Some First Amendment Problems Judge Neil M. Gorsuch on Free Expression by Brian C. Baran & Nathaniel Rubin on March 12, 2017 Introduction On the 2016 campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump promised he would pick a Supreme Court nominee in the mold of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. To this end, President Trump narrowed his candidate shortlist to three federal appellate judges who had the approval of the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society, and whom the press… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch and Free Exercise by Sean R. Janda on March 12, 2017 Introduction This Essay examines how Judge Gorsuch, if confirmed, would approach religious freedom cases. It first looks at two free exercise cases Judge Gorsuch has participated in. Then it extracts principles from those cases and from his other writings that help explain how a Justice Gorsuch might contextualize religious freedom claims. Finally, it applies those… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch and the Establishment Clause by James Y. Xi on March 12, 2017 Introduction The proper meaning of the Establishment Clause has sharply divided the Court for decades. Nowhere is this more obvious than in cases dealing with the constitutionality of religious displays. The Court has held that it is unconstitutional, for example, for a city to display a holiday crèche (a Nativity scene) if it stands alone.… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch and the Fourth Amendment by Sophie J. Hart & Dennis M. Martin on March 12, 2017 Introduction Before Justice Scalia, pragmatic balancing tests dominated the Court’s Fourth Amendment doctrine. But by 2008, Justice Scalia had succeeded in reframing the Court’s analysis. In an opinion joined by seven other Justices, he wrote: “In determining whether a search or seizure is unreasonable, we begin with history. We look to the statutes and common… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Restraint and the Rights of Criminal Defendants Judge Gorsuch on the Sixth Amendment by Abbee Cox & Katherine Moy on March 12, 2017 Introduction Whatever openness to the claims of criminal defendants Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch may have displayed in his Fourth Amendment decisions finds no counterpart in his opinions touching on Sixth Amendment rights. In each of the four cases in which Judge Gorsuch has dissented on Sixth Amendment grounds, his desired holding would have… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch and the Future of Immigration Deference by Matthew Sellers on March 12, 2017 Introduction If the first couple of months of the Trump Administration are any guide, immigration will be front and center before the Supreme Court in coming terms. How a future Justice Gorsuch might rule on the thorny questions of administrative law, due process, and executive power that these cases raise will turn on how much… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch and Civil Rights A Restrictive Reading by Maria Buxton, Hannah Kieschnick & Robyn D. Levin on March 12, 2017 Introduction Upon the announcement of his nomination to the United States Supreme Court, Judge Gorsuch said that “[a] judge who likes every outcome he reaches is very likely a bad judge . . . stretching for results he prefers rather than those the law demands.” This notion is central to his jurisprudence. Judge Gorsuch hews closely to a… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch on Qualified Immunity by Shannon M. Grammel on March 12, 2017 Introduction In the wake of Tenth Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court, there has been much buzz about his 2016 dissent in a case involving a seventh grader arrested for burping during gym class. The Tenth Circuit shielded the arresting officer from suit, granting him qualified immunity. Judge Gorsuch disagreed: “Respectfully, I… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch If Goliath Falls Judge Gorsuch and the Administrative State by Trevor W. Ezell & Lloyd Marshall on March 12, 2017 Introduction When it comes to Judge Gorsuch’s views on administrative law, the focus has been on one opinion—his concurrence in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. Lynch. In addition to authoring the majority opinion, Judge Gorsuch concurred separately to air concerns over Chevron’s rule requiring courts to defer to the judgments of executive agencies. “We managed to live with… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Judge Gorsuch on Antitrust by Rachel Frank on March 12, 2017 Introduction With a career spanning the Justice Department, private practice, and the bench, Judge Gorsuch would bring to the Supreme Court an antitrust background comparable to that of former Justice John Paul Stevens. His background demonstrates a suspicion of unilateral theories of liability and a preference for bright-line rules that points to him leading the… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Justice Scalia’s Heir Apparent? Judge Gorsuch’s Approach to Textualism and Originalism by Max Alderman & Duncan Pickard on March 12, 2017 Introduction Numerous commentators argue that, if confirmed, Justice Neil Gorsuch would follow the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s signature methodological contributions: originalism and textualism. Indeed, Judge Gorsuch styles himself as a judge in Justice Scalia’s vein. In a tribute to the late Justice, he responded to Justice Scalia’s critics by arguing that “an assiduous focus on… Volume 69 (2016-2017)
Symposium - 2017- Gorsuch Rights, Facts, and Relevant Inquiries Surveying Judge Neil M. Gorsuch’s Employment Law Jurisprudence by Camille E. Peeples on March 12, 2017 Introduction What consequences will the 2016 election have for employment and labor law? President Trump’s potential policies are uncertain, especially given Andrew Puzder’s withdrawal and Alexander Acosta’s nomination as Labor Secretary. Consequently, Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil M. Gorsuch’s past Tenth Circuit decisions may be increasingly of interest. This Essay presents a brief overview of… Volume 69 (2016-2017)